Why is there a special loophole for gun shows?
Can you buy guns off the internet without a background check and get them shipped right to your front door?
Criminals worry about background checks, right?
Click here to find out the answers to these questions.
Copyright © Gun.Vote, VoteGun.Net, AR.Life, Pro-Gun.Net
All Rights Reserved
Too many who fear an armed citizenry through ignorance or tyrannical ideals or just see it as politicly expedient to vilify the possession of arms have been given the power to interfere with the Constitutional guarantee that we can "keep and bear arms".
What good have guns ever done anyway?
Find out here: NRA-ILA's Armed Citizen
Dana Loesch, NRA Spokesperson with real facts.
Podcast: Truth, a Casualty in Democrats' War on Guns
AWR Hawkins discusses FBI crime stats which completely undercut Democrat gun control arguments, as well as other truths.
Where can you find real facts about guns and crime?
Message is below the "I Vote Gun" badges
to Guns Down
with fake "facts".
Truth VS. Fiction
~Important Message for Voters~
With today's fear-mongering anti-gun politicians your gun rights are at great risk every time you vote. So, if you want to have and keep the right to own, carry a gun, and also the gun you want, then you better think carefully before you vote.
You often hear anti-gun politicians say they just want "common sense" gun reform, nebulous terminology meant to trick the voter by seeming to appeal to what it means to them. But what they really want through the laws they propose, is to get rid of as many guns as they can, for some this means all guns if they could. They say it's all in the name of reducing "gun violence". The term "gun violence" is meant to deceive you, we don't say club violence, stabbing violence, choking violence or name any other violence by the tool used, because it's ridiculous and it's just as ridiculous to say "gun violence". It's clear that it's just a political tactic to make you afraid of guns when it's violence, not the tool used, that you should be concerned with. With violence, you can't expect to get a meaningful reduction in it by changing the tools used. If the root of violence isn't what is changed then the violence remains.
They count all homicides by gun as if they were all murder and only occurred because a gun was used, while in 2018 two-thirds of all gun deaths were suicide for which, though the least gun will do, no gun is needed. Japan has virtually no guns but has one of the highest suicide rates in the world, there's a myriad of ways to die without a gun. For the anti-gun crowd, it's always the guns fault. For them when a gun is used for crime/murder the gun is the root cause, for lawful self-defense of anyone, they count that against the gun. When someone commits suicide with a gun, it's the gun's fault. It's the gun, not the responsible person, who's to blame when an accident occurs with one. For some, even with police shooting deaths, it's the gun that's to blame. They would like you to believe guns are what makes people choose to do what they do.
They want to make you afraid that without their laws criminals are getting or will get guns and harm you. Consider this; criminals don't obey laws by definition, so if guns, their use, their parts, magazines, accessories, and types of ammunition are heavily restricted and/or burdened with biased laws, fees and taxes, who do you think is at a disadvantage, the criminals who will get these things anyway or the honest citizens who obey the law? How many people who have had crimes committed against them, are severely injured or even die at the hands of criminals, would not have if they had a gun to defend themselves. Those that can defend themselves are the ones who are less likely to be on the losing end of violence and/or crime.
The guns they target most are "assault rifles", (semi-auto rifles similar to, mistaken for or implied to be machine guns), yet for murders, any rifle, nevermind "assault rifles" are among the least used weapons, you are more likely to be beaten or stabbed to death than killed with any type of rifle. They claim the AR15 is a "weapon of war", even though it's not a machine gun like the military versions, and the ammunition used in it is a logistical medium-powered compromise rather than the more powerful ammunition of the military's past main battle rifles, most hunting rifles are significantly more powerful and deadly. So why is it the number one type of gun they target to reduce "gun violence"? It should make you wonder if they're really trying to reduce violence or just trying to use it as a convenient boogieman to scare you with so they'll have something they can claim they'll protect you from to get your vote.
When these politicians lie, misrepresent facts, or don't even care what the real facts are, they show that they are willing to deceive you to get your vote. So if your candidate says they just want "common sense" gun reform you should find out for yourself before you vote what they really want and is what they propose actually sensible in the face of the true and complete facts, because after you vote it's too late.
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government. -George Washington-